![]() ![]() ![]() This explanation is logical, because animals do not possess the required rationality and intelligence to vote. Referring to the voting rights, Singer notes that “the case for equality between men and women cannot validly be extended to nonhuman animals” (Singer & Regan, 1989, p. Singer tries to be objective, admitting that animals are different from humans in many aspects, this is why many human rights cannot yet be granted to animals. ![]() He is associated for fighting for the animal rights’ equality and justifies his theory by the equality of sufferings both animals and humans can experience. Peter Singer has become well known for his theory of animal rights early in 1970s. The work will be aimed at discussing both viewpoints.Ĭriticism of Peter Singer’s Theory of Animal Rights through the Prism of Aristotle’s Philosophy On the contrary, Aristotle was viewing animals merely as the source of food and other products, as well as being inferior to men. Peter Singer has become well known for his protection of animal rights’ equality. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |